Legal Opinion
Zynda v. Arwood
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided March 29, 2016No. Case No. 15-11449PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS
ROBERT H. CLELAND, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Plaintiffs, who are various individual unemployment-benefit claimants along with *797an association and a union (Sugar Law Center, and the International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace, and Agricultural Implement Workers of America (“UAW”)), filed suit alleging various Constitutional and statutory violations arising from Michigan’s administration of its unemployment benefits program. (Dkt. # 1, Pg. ID 2.) Before the court is Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss…
2Cases cited60 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Cahoo v. Sas Inst. Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2018
- Burley v. Sumner County 18th Judicial Drug Task ForceDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2020
- Cahoo v. SAS Analytics Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2020
- Cahoo v. SAS Analytics Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2020
- Cheryl L. Theriot v. United States Department of Labor, et al.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2025
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.