Legal Opinion

Major v. Symmes

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1862PublishedCited by 8 opinions

APPEAL from the Ohio Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHanna, J.

Symmes, a married woman, was entitled to an interest in the real estate of a deceased relative. To secure and defend that interest, in litigation which arose among *118■the heirs, she employed counsel. After her interest had been set apart, this suit was instituted by counsel, to recover •for services, and, she being a non-resident, a lien prayed .upon said lands. Her husband was made a party defendant.

Demurrer sustained to the complaint.

It is insisted, by the appellee, that she, being a married woman, could not contract, and, therefore, could not become liable expressly, nor by implication, for…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Yale v. . DedererNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
  2. North American Coal Co. v. DyettNew York Court of Chancery · 1837
  3. Gardner v. GardnerNew York Court of Chancery · 1838
  4. Trustees of Methodist Episcopal Church v. JaquesNew York Court of Chancery · 1817
  5. Wooster v. NorthrupWisconsin Supreme Court · 1856

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Henneger v. LomasIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Lindley v. CrossIndiana Supreme Court · 1869
  3. Terry v. HammondsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873
  4. Sharpe v. CliffordIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  5. Cook v. WaltonIndiana Supreme Court · 1871

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API