Legal Opinion

Reagan v. Union Mutual Life Insurance

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided December 1, 1905PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKnowlton, C. J.

This is an action of contract on a policy of life insurance issued to the plaintiff’s intestate. The defendant answered that the policy was obtained by fraud of the insured. The policy contains a clause as follows: “ Incontestability. This policy is incontestable from date of issue for any cause, except non-payment of premium.” After having introduced proofs of her intestate’s death, and other evidence that made a prima facie case, the plaintiff rested, her counsel stating as her contention, “ that no question of health or fraud such as is set up in the answer is open to the defendant under…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Massachusetts Benefit Life Ass'n v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
  2. Burt v. Union Central Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  3. Goodwin v. Provident Savings Life Assurance Ass'nSupreme Court of Iowa · 1896
  4. Wright v. Mutual Benefit Life Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  5. Clement v. Insurance Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1898

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Bates v. SouthgateMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
  2. Protective Life Insurance v. SullivanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
  3. Indiana National Life Insurance v. McGinnisIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Wheeler v. O'ConnellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
  5. New York Life Insurance v. HardisonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API