Legal Opinion

Dewolf v. Ericson

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 29, 1928No. 26,686PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDibell, J.

' Action to recover the sum of $>4,261.06, the amount decreed by the probate court of Pine county to be the distributive share of the plaintiff in the estate of Milo D. Gates, her father, of which the defendant was the administrator. The defendant answered and asked that the decree of the probate court be amended. He also alleged that he had paid the plaintiff.

The court made findings and directed the amendment of the decree and further found that the defendant had paid the plaintiff in full. From a judgment amending the probate judgment and adjudging that the plaintiff recover nothing, the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Pierce v. MaetzoldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
  2. Vaule v. MillerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
  3. Leach v. LeachSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
  4. First Trust & Savings Bank v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
  5. Schmitz v. MartinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. National Surety Corporation of New York v. EllisonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1937
  2. Bengtson v. SetterbergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
  3. In Re Estate of SimonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
  4. In Re Estate of TurnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
  5. Wold v. Peoples Trust & Savings BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API