Legal Opinion

People v. Taft

New York Supreme Court

Decided September 19, 1940PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPersonius, J.

As to the first motion the evidence presented a question of fact; the credibility of the People’s witnesses was for the jury. The evident reluctance of some of' them might have inclined the jury to credit their testimony. It is denied.

As to the second motion, the defendant did not plead a former judgment of conviction or acquittal. (Code Crim. Proc. §§ 332, 334; People v. Smith, 172 N. Y. 210, 227.)

However, the question is involved in other cases. We, therefore, consider the second motion on its merits. The defendant was convicted under indictment No. 52 of violating sections 986 and *1034970…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Morey v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
  2. Burton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  3. People v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
  4. People v. TavorminaNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
  5. People v. SilvermanNew York Court of Appeals · 1939

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. De Sisto, New York County Courts1961
  2. People ex rel. Adams v. MoranNew York Supreme Court · 1962
  3. People ex rel. Thornton v. BeckerNew York Supreme Court · 1947
  4. People v. BarrowNew York Supreme Court · 1964
  5. People v. CatlinNew York County Court, Queens County · 1961

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API