Legal Opinion
Dubinsky v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided July 9, 1999No. 98-884CPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*362ORDER ON COSTS AND EAJA FEES AND EXPENSES
BRUGGINK, Judge.
On March 25,1999, the court granted summary judgment in plaintiffs favor in this bid protest action.2 See Dubinsky v. United States, 43 Fed.Cl. 243 (1999), appeal filed, No. 99-5107 (Fed.Cir. June 1, 1999). The court enjoined continuance of the contract with the putative awardee, defendant-intervenor Daktronics, Inc. (“Daktronics”). See id. at 274-75. We also awarded plaintiff bid preparation costs of $2,000 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1491(b)(2) (Supp. II 1996) and granted plaintiff costs under 28 U.S.C. § 1920 (1994). See id. at 275-76.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Commissioner, Immigration & Naturalization Service v. JeanSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Ardestani v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Charles W. Bazalo, Claimant-Appellant v. Togo D. West, Jr., Secretary of Veterans AffairsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- James Doty and Susan Doty v. The United States, Defendant/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Impresa Construzioni Geom. Domenico Garufi v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Comprehensive Health Services, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- Dubinsky v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1999