Legal Opinion

Haney v. Fire Insurance Exchange

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 9, 2009No. SD 29098PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiffs sued Defendants Fire Insurance Exchange (FIE), Roybal, and Apex for mold exposure. After several years of legal maneuvering irrelevant to this appeal, the action was dismissed for failure to state a claim. Plaintiffs appeal.

General Allegations

On April 15, 2001, a tornado tore the roof from a home owned by Gay and Larry Taylor and insured by FIE. The Taylors hired Plaintiffs, d/b/a Haney Construction, to assess and fix the damage. Plaintiffs understood FIE would pay for the repairs.

Several weeks later, following rains on the damaged house, FIE hired Apex to do an environmental study…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Nitro Distributing, Inc. v. DunnSupreme Court of Missouri · 2006
  2. Transit Casualty Co. v. Transit Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2001
  3. Dagley v. Haag Engineering Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2000
  4. Lough Ex Rel. Lough v. Rolla Women's Clinic, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  5. Akpan v. Farmers Ins. Exchange, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2007

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Robert Lodholtz v. York Risk Services Group, IncoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
  2. Pippin v. HILL-ROM CO., INC.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
  3. Aleck Vs. Zb Nat'L Ass'NNevada Supreme Court · 2021
  4. Curtis v. KingDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 2018
  5. Fogerty v. Quiktrip CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2022

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API