Legal Opinion

In re Goldstein

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided April 18, 1914No. 3324PublishedCited by 2 opinions

In Bankruptcy. In the matter of bankruptcy proceedings of Sarah Horwitz Goldstein. On appeal from a recommendation of a special master that a composition be not confirmed.

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, District Judge.

This case comes before the court on an appeal from the report of the special master recommending that a composition of 35 per cent, be not confirmed on the ground that a majority in number of creditors and a' majority' in amount oppose it, and because the written statement signed by the bankrupt prior to bankruptcy was not an accurate statement of her financial condition.

The petitioner was adjudicated a bankrupt on the 29th of January, 1914, and on the 21st of February, 1914, filed a petition with the master for the confirmation of a composition of 35 per cent. On the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In re RiderDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1899
  2. Broadway Trust Co. v. ManheimNew York Supreme Court · 1905
  3. In re ShafferDistrict Court, N.D. West Virginia · 1909
  4. In re ComstockDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1907
  5. In re BardeDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1913

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re KornbluthCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1933
  2. In Re JeppsonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Utah · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API