Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Carmody

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 15, 2002PublishedCited by 70 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BECK, J.:

¶ 1 In this Commonwealth appeal the question we examine is whether a witness’s signed and adopted statement may be admitted as substantive evidence at a preliminary hearing despite the witness’s claim that the statement is unreliable because she was intoxicated at the time she gave it. We conclude that under the facts of this case the statement was admissible and so reverse the ruling of the habeas court.

¶ 2 Joseph Carmody was arrested after his girlfriend, Maryann Torres, called police to report that Carmody had assaulted her. Torres arrived at the Moore Township police station at…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BradySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  2. Commonwealth v. LivelySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  3. Commonwealth v. MartiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  4. Commonwealth v. McBrideSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  5. Commonwealth v. GoreSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by70 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BrownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  2. Commonwealth v. GraySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  3. Commonwealth v. SandersSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  4. Commonwealth v. WatleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  5. Commonwealth v. LevanduskiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API