Krohn v. Heyn
Texas Supreme Court
Appeal from Howard. Tried below before Hon. Wm. Kennedy. A full statement of this case would require much space, and would not tend to make more clear the opinion on the points decided.
1Opinion of the Court
COLLARD, Judge.
—There are many objections to the conclusions of *320fact found by the court and its judgment. We do not think it necessary to notice all of them in detail.
It is urged by the appellant Mrs. Krohn that the court erred in finding that Mrs. Krohn had not loaned to Heyn, the defendant, the notes and money as alleged by her.
There is an irreconcilable conflict in the testimony on this point. Had the court accepted the testimony of Mrs. Krohn as true, his conclusion would doubtless have been that she had turned over the notes and the $100 in money to Heyn as a loan, and that her cause of…
2Cited by13 opinions
- Michels v. CrouchCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
- Whitney v. Parish of VernonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
- Clem v. FulghumCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
- Ware v. Poindexter Furniture & Carpet Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1938
- Ferguson v. Rhoades Drilling Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1925
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.