Legal Opinion

Watts v. Michigan Multi-King, Inc.

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided December 14, 2010No. Docket No. 293185PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff appeals as of right the trial court’s order granting defendant’s motion for summary disposition on the basis of the open and obvious danger doctrine. We reverse and remand. This appeal has been decided without oral argument pursuant to MCR 7.214(E).

I. BACKGROUND

On February 27, 2008, at approximately 4:00 p.m., plaintiff was finishing a meal at defendant’s restaurant in Northville, Michigan. There was no precipitation falling that day, but plaintiff stated that there may have been snow on the ground outside. Plaintiff was wearing boots with approximately l1/2-inch wedge heels, and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Maiden v. RozwoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Lugo v. Ameritech Corp., Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Felgner v. AndersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Corley v. Detroit Board of EducationMichigan Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Ritchie-Gamester v. City of BerkleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1999

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Jahnke v. AllenMichigan Court of Appeals · 2014
  2. Kathryn Matteson v. Northwest Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
  3. Christian Cioroiu v. City of TroyMichigan Court of Appeals · 2021
  4. Estate of Karen a MacAskill v. the Kroger CompanyMichigan Court of Appeals · 2015
  5. Estate of Karen a MacAskill v. the Kroger CompanyMichigan Court of Appeals · 2015

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API