Legal Opinion
Federal Deposit Insurance v. Wabick
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided August 2, 2002No. 01 C 8674PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
SHAD UR, Senior District Judge.
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) has brought a four-count 1 Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”) against a group of defendants, claiming to have been the victim of a fraudulent scheme to obtain defaulted real estate loans in a sealed bid auction. Three defendants — David Wabick (“David”), Patricia Wabick (“Patricia”) and Lorraine Wabick (“Lorraine”) — have filed independent motions to dismiss pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. (“Rule”) 12(b)(6). Larry and Janelle Ettner (“Larry” and “Janelle,” collectively “Ettners”) have jointly…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. Kimbell Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
- O'Melveny & Myers v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Joseph F. Cada v. Baxter Healthcare CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- R2 Investments, LDC v. World Access, Inc. (In Re World Access, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2003
- Ashcroft v. RandelDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2005
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. WabickDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2002