Legal Opinion

Roehm v. County of Orange

California Supreme Court

Decided July 30, 1948No. L. A. 20171Published

1Opinion of the Court

32 Cal.2d 280 (1948)

E. L. ROEHM, Appellant,

v.

COUNTY OF ORANGE et al., Respondents.

L. A. No. 20171.

Supreme Court of California. In Bank.

July 30, 1948.

Head, Wellington & Jacobs, Arthur M. Bradley and Otto A. Jacobs for Appellant.

Fred N. Howser, Attorney General, J. Albert Hutchinson, Deputy Attorney General, Irwin M. Fulop, Landon Morris, Albert E. Isenberg, Holbrook & Tarr and W. Sumner Holbrook, Jr., as Amici Curiae on behalf of Appellant.

Joe Ogle, County Counsel, George F. Holden, Royal E. Hubbard, Deputy County Counsel, and John K. Colwell, City Attorney (Santa Ana), for Respondents.

Harold…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Dawson v. Kentucky Distilleries & Warehouse Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
  2. Ingels v. RileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Los Angeles Gas & Electric Co. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  4. People v. ColemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1854
  5. Fisher v. CushmanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1900

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API