Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Hayes
Indiana Court of Appeals
Erom Dearborn Circuit Court; William 3. Ilolman, Special Judge. Action by the Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Company against George Hayes and others. Erom a judgment for defendants, plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtWiley, C. J.
Counsel for appellees admits in his brief that the statement of the record, as made by counsel for appellant, is substantially correct. This admission authorizes us to accept such statement as true, and, briefly stated, the issues joined, the facts relied upon, and all the rulings of the court and the errors assigned, are as follows:
Appellant filed an instrument of appropriation in the court below in vacation. Appraisers were appointed and returned their appraisement and award of damages. Appellant filed exceptions to the award, and the appellees answered the exceptions. Appellees filed an…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Oliver v. Union Point & White Plains RailroadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1889
- Pittsburgh, Fort Wayne & Chicago Railway Co. v. SwinneyIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
- Consumers' Gas Trust Co. v. HarlessIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
- Lake Erie & Western Railway Co. v. KinseyIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
- St. Louis & San Francisco Railway Co. v. Evans & Howard Fire Brick Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1884
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Hitt v. CarrIndiana Court of Appeals · 1921