Legal Opinion

Teddy Bear Pools, Inc. v. Kusiak

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided January 13, 2000PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtLoConto, P.J.

Aggrieved by the trial judge’s decision, the defendant, Joseph E. Kusiak (“Kusiak”), brought this appeal pursuant to Rule 8C of the District/Municipal Courts Rules for Appellate Division Appeal. The facts necessaiy for an understanding of the issues, as taken from the settled and approved statement of the facts submitted in accordance with rule 8C(e) are as follows. On or about March 6, 1986, the plaintiff Teddy Bear Pools, Inc. (‘Teddy Bear”) entered into an agreement with Kusiak for the installation of a swimming pool and concrete deck around the pool for $15,600.00. Included therein was…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bartley v. PhillipsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
  2. First Pennsylvania Mortgage Trust v. Dorchester Savings BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
  3. Freyermuth v. LutfyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
  4. Ward v. American Mutual Liability InsuranceMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1983
  5. Freeman v. MarchiMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1965

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Arrow Financial Services, LLC. v. MannettaMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API