Legal Opinion
United States v. Huezo
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided October 14, 2008No. Docket 07-0031-crPublishedCited by 92 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Judge NEWMAN concurs in a separate opinion.
Judge SOTOMAYOR dissents in a separate opinion.
JOHN M. WALKER, JR., Circuit Judge:
Following a jury trial, defendant-appellant Juan Manuel Huezo was found guilty of money laundering, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1956(a)(l)(B)(l) and 2, and conspiracy to launder money, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1956(h). The District Court for the Southern District of New York (Samuel Conti, Judge1) granted Huezo’s post-verdict motion for a judgment of acquittal pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 29(c)(2), concluding that the evidence was insufficient to…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. Carmine TramuntiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- United States v. SalamehCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- United States v. Edmund M. AutuoriCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Harold v. Gleason, Paul Luftig and J. Michael CarterCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by92 opinions
- Jasco Tools, Inc. v. Dana Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
- United States v. SabhnaniCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
- United States v. CoplanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
- United States v. TrejoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. StewartCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
87 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.