Legal Opinion

American Federation of Government Employees v. Federal Service Impasses Panel

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided March 15, 2022No. Civil Action No. 2020-2683Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES, National Council of HUD Locals Council 222, AFL-CIO, Civil Case No. 20-2683 (RJL) Plaintiff, Vv. FEDERAL SERVICE IMPASSES PANEL, et al., A A a _ a a_i Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION (March ( 4, 2022) [Dkt. #19]. Plaintiff American Federation of Government Employees, National Council of HUD Locals Council 222, AFL-CIO (“Council 222”) is a public-sector union that represents employees of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”). After a breakdown in negotiations between…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Thunder Basin Coal Co. v. ReichSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Akinseye v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2003

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API