Legal Opinion

Anita Sanchez v. Andrew Saul

District Court, C.D. California

Decided October 22, 2020No. 2:19-cv-06862Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ANITA S.,1 Case No. 2:19-cv-06862-GJS 12 Plaintiff MEMORANDUM OPINION AND 13 v. ORDER 14 ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security, 15 Defendant. 16 17 I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY 18 Plaintiff Anita S. filed a complaint seeking review of Defendant 19 Commissioner of Social Security’s (“Commissioner”) denial of her application for 20 Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”). The parties filed consents to proceed before 21 the undersigned United States Magistrate Judge [Dkts. 11, 12] and briefs addressing 22 disputed…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Orn v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  3. Treichler v. Commissioner of Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  4. Carmickle v. Commissioner, Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  5. Kim Brown-Hunter v. Carolyn W. ColvinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API