Legal Opinion

Bailey v. Century Finance Company

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 20, 1969No. 44453PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Dben, Judge.

1. “A right of action for malicious prosecution exists only when the prosecution is the result of a desire to injure the accused. In such an action malice against the accused may be inferred from want of probable cause; but the want of probable cause will not be inferred, even though malice is shown to have existed.” (Emphasis supplied.) Hicks v. Brantley, 102 Ga. 264 (1) (29 SE 459); Tanner-Brice Co. v. Barrs, 55 Ga. App. 453 (3) (190 SE 676). Nor can the presence of probable cause be inferred from lack of malice. It was accordingly error for the court to charge in this malicious…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hicks v. BrantleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
  2. Tanner-Brice Co. v. BarrsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1937
  3. Seamans v. HogeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
  4. Bailey v. CENTURY FINANCE COMPANYCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Stock v. ByersSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980
  2. FRANKLIN LIFE INSURANCE v. HillCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
  3. Gibson's Products Co. of Albany, Inc. v. McDanielCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
  4. Gibson's Products Co. of Albany, Inc. v. McDanielCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API