Legal Opinion

Hixon v. Mathieu

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided August 31, 1977PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARCHIBALD, Justice.

Brenda J. Hixon instituted this civil action to recover damages for her personal injuries resulting from an automobile accident. She was joined as plaintiff by her husband who demanded damages for loss of consortium, for medical expenses incurred on behalf of his wife, and for property damage. The jury returned a verdict in favor of the defendant, from which both plaintiffs have appealed after their motions for judgment n. o. v. (Rule 50(b), M.R.C.P.) and for a new trial (Rule 59(a), M.R.C.P.) were denied.

We sustain the appeal and order a new trial.

The defendant,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Packard v. WhittenSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1971
  2. Hedgecock v. OrloskyIndiana Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Cook v. ThomasWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Bundy v. Ambulance Indianapolis Dispatch, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1973
  5. Coombs v. MackleySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1928

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Teel v. ColsonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
  2. Nyzio v. VaillancourtSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
  3. Ames v. Dipietro-Kay Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1992
  4. Hawke v. HawkeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
  5. Laliberte v. MeadSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1993

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API