Legal Opinion
Fiolat v. Minnesota-Atlantic Transit Co.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided February 8, 1940PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
SULLIVAN, District Judge.
This is an action brought by the administratrix appointed by the Probate Court of St. Louis County, Minnesota. In the complaint it is alleged that the defendant is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Delaware; that the deceased, during his lifetime, was a seaman; that he was a citizen of Minnesota; that he was injured during the course and scope of his employment by the defendant on one of its ships, and that as a result of said injuries, he died. This action is brought for the benefit of the seaman’s *220widow, who, it is alleged, is his…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Panama Railroad v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Cortes v. Baltimore Insular Line, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Engel v. DavenportSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Lindgren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Lynott v. . Great Lakes Transit CorporationNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Holder v. Pet Bakery Division, I.C. Industries, Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1982