Legal Opinion

In re Destiny T.

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided March 10, 2009PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSaufley, C.J.

[¶ 1] The mother of Destiny T., Seth T., and Hope R. and the father of Seth appeal from a jeopardy determination entered in the District Court (Springvale, Foster, J.) pursuant to 22 M.R.S. § 4035 (2007).1 The mother challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support a jeopardy finding and argues that her constitutional right to due process was violated and the court abused its discretion by refusing to allow fourteen-year-old Destiny to testify. The father contends that the court erred in finding that Seth would be in circumstances of jeopardy in the father’s care because the Department…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re Scott S.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2001
  2. In Re Matthew W.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2006
  3. In Re Morris D.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
  4. In re Dakota P.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2005

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. In re B.C.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2012
  2. Judy Sparks v. Brant SparksSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2013
  3. In re M.E.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2014
  4. Raynes v. Department of CorrectionsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2010
  5. In re Child of Nicholas G.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2019

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API