Legal Opinion

McDonald v. Noga

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 3, 1958No. Appeal, 101PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice Jones,

• ' The plaintiff brought this suit in equity to restrain preliminarily and, upon final hearing, permanently the eleven named defendants from interfering with his ingress and egress to and from certain property of which he claims to be the lessee. After what the chancellor described as “a rather full hearing of witnesses for both the plaintiff and the defendants”, a- preliminary injunction was denied in a decree from which the plaintiff has brought this appeal pursuant to the provisions of the Act of June 12, 1879, P. L. 177, 12 PS §1102.

On an appeal from .a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lindenfelser v. LindenfelserSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  2. Aldrich v. GeahrySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  3. Bunnell's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1871
  4. Myersdale & Salisbury Street Railway Co. v. Pennsylvania & Maryland Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1908
  5. Herr v. RumisekSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Safeguard Mutual Insurance v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. Robinson v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  3. Boehm v. University of Pennsylvania School of Veterinary MedicineSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  4. Vulcanized Rubber & Plastics Co. v. ScheckterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  5. Sprankle v. BurnsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API