Korthuis v. Soderling & Sons
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Magney, Justice.
Certiorari to the industrial commission to review an order granting compensation for death.
The facts, which are not in dispute, are detailed as follows: Relator, Soderling & Sons, is in the dry-cleaning and tailoring business in the city of Willmar. It has no agencies. On August 24, 1940, Lubbert Korthuis began to bring in work for relator. He would pick up clothing, and relator would do the dry cleaning and repairing. He was the owner of a Chevrolet truck, which was used in the work. Relator had nothing to do with the financing of the truck and had no expense in connection…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Waters v. Pioneer Fuel Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
- State ex rel. Virginia & Rainy Lake Co. v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- Herron v. Coolsaet Bros.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
- Angell v. White Eagle Oil & Refining Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
- Elliason v. Western Coal & Coke Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Aleckson v. Kennedy Motor Sales Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
- Geerdes v. J. R. Watkins Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
- Otten v. University HospitalsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
- Oestreich v. Lakeside Cemetery Assn.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
- Castner v. ChristgauSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.