Legal Opinion

Ponina v. Leland

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided April 30, 1969No. 5660PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Collins, C. J.:

This appeal is from an order determining heirship and a holding that Allie Ponina was not the wife and hence not the widow of Paul Ponina, deceased. We reverse that ruling and declare that Allie and Paul were husband and wife at the time of his death. She is therefore entitled to share in his estate as his widow.

Allie Ponina is an aged (71 years) full-blooded Paiute Indian and a member of the Pyramid Lake-Nixon Tribe. She was formerly married to a man named Lowery who died in 1950 or 1951.

Paul Ponina was also an aged full-blooded Paiute Indian but a member…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ormachea v. OrmacheaNevada Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Chancey v. WhinnerySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  3. State v. ZichfeldNevada Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Clark v. ClarkNevada Supreme Court · 1964
  5. In re Wo-Gin-Up's EstateUtah Supreme Court · 1920

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Voorhees v. SpencerNevada Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Irving v. IrvingNevada Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Bertha L. Matlock v. Railroad Retirement BoardCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
  4. Le v. State Farm Fire and Casualty CompanyDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API