Legal Opinion

Irving v. Irving

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided May 25, 2006No. 44142PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Hardesty, J.:

In this case of first impression, we address the level of proof required to establish fraud to obtain an annulment under NRS 125.340(1). We conclude that fraud must be proved by clear and convincing evidence. Since, in this case, the record does not contain substantial evidence supporting a finding of fraud by clear and convincing evidence, we reverse the district court’s order annulling the parties’ marriage.

FACTS

After meeting through a pen pal service, appellant Beatriz S. Irving, who was living in the Philippines, and respondent Gilbert J. Irving, who was…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Bulbman, Inc. v. Nevada BellNevada Supreme Court · 1992
  2. State v. CatanioNevada Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Lubbe v. BarbaNevada Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Cohen v. Mirage Resorts, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 2003
  5. California Commercial Enterprises v. Amedeo Vegas I, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 2003

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. J.D. Construction, Inc. v. IBEX International Group, LLCNevada Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Williams v. United Parcel ServicesNevada Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Pawlik v. Shyang-Fenn DengNevada Supreme Court · 2018
  4. City of Las Vegas v. EvansNevada Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Da Silva Vs. Da SilvaNevada Supreme Court · 2021

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API