Legal Opinion

Cox v. State Farm General Insurance

Buffalo City Court

Decided January 21, 2009Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Jeffrey F. Voelkl, J.

I, Background Facts

These seven actions have been combined for the purpose of deciding various motions to dismiss made by the defendants pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (8) which involve a common question of law. These actions are all for recovery of money damages. The plaintiffs are health care providers who provided medical care to their various patients. These patients were all insureds of the defendants who had their first-party no-fault claims denied. They then assigned their various claims to the plaintiffs. It should be noted that the defendants…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Pohlers v. Exeter Manufacturing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1944
  2. Hyman & Gilbert v. GreensteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  3. In re the Arbitration between Bauer & Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1969
  4. Ferriere v. Pete Sublett & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
  5. Marita Car Rentals, Inc. v. IshtiaqCity of New York Municipal Court · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API