Legal Opinion
Brokke v. Stauffer Chemical Co.
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided December 28, 1988No. Civ. B-87-689( WWE)PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
EGINTON, District Judge.
After review and over objection, the considered and well-reasoned opinion of the magistrate is ADOPTED, RATIFIED, and AFFIRMED.
MAGISTRATE’S OPINION
THOMAS P. SMITH, United States Magistrate.
This is an action brought pursuant to the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”), 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq. (Count One), and the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. (Counts Nine and Ten). The Fourth Amended Complaint also contains various claims premised on state law (Counts Two through Eight). Pending are motions for summary judgment…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Owen Equipment & Erection Co. v. KrogerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Colodny v. Iverson, Yoakum, Papiano & HatchDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 1993
- Weber v. Jacobs Manufacturing Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1990
- Wrench LLC v. Taco Bell Corp.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1998
- Cutter Realty Group, Inc. v. Schiraldi (In Re Schiraldi)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut · 1990
- Christensen v. Chesebrough-Pond's, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.