Legal Opinion

Brandt v. Schal Associates, Inc.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided July 17, 1990No. 85 C 357PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

SHADUR, District Judge.

This Court’s detailed May 2, 1990 Findings of Fact (“Findings”) and Conclusions of Law (“Conclusions”), collectively referred to as “Opinion II” 131 F.R.D. 485:1(a) held that Schal Defendants are entitled to receive the sum of $351,664.96 (that figure was held to be the total amount of reasonable attorneys’ fees and expenses incurred by Schal Defendants as a direct result of Campbell’s violations of Rule 11) — subject to appropriate further adjustments — from Campbell as sanctions under Rule 11; and(b) directed the parties to address, by…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Missouri v. Jenkins Ex Rel. AgyeiSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Pennsylvania v. Delaware Valley Citizens' Council for Clean AirSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Above Belt, Inc. v. Mel Bohannan Roofing, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1983
  5. Keene Corp. v. International Fidelity InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1983

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. In Re: Jerome Berg, Debtor. Jerome Berg v. Good Samaritan HospitalCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  2. In Re SlaughterUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1995
  3. Brandt v. Schal Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
  4. Clipse v. StateCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1991
  5. In Re Telesphere International Securities LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1990

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API