Legal Opinion
Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. Ouart
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided April 8, 1947No. 32002PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBayless, J.
The Magnolia Petroleum Company has appealed from a judgment decreeing C. J. Ouart and Leila Ouart a 7/48ths interest and Eva F. Hunter a 5/95ths interest in the %th royalty in the lease in controversy and a money judgment for their prorata part of the royalty funds impounded by Magnolia at the date of trial. The interests of other persons were determined by the judgment, but we are concerned only with the controversy between Magnolia and the parties named above.
This controversy involves the interpretation of an oil and gas lease, Producer’s Form 88, executed by the Ouarts in 1938. The lease…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- McMahan v. McMahonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1922
- Hare Mining & Milling Co. v. KeysSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- Intertype Corp. v. PulverCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1933
- Lester v. FieldsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Bowdish v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Messler v. Simmons Gun Specialties, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
- James C. Ellis and Wanda Lou Ellis, His Wife v. Arkansas Louisiana Gas CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1979
- Oklahoma Company v. O'NEILSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1968
- Matter of Estate of SneedSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
- Maxfield v. MaxfieldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.