Legal Opinion
Intertype Corp. v. Pulver
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided June 3, 1933No. 6861PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRYAN, Circuit Judge.
The Intertype Corporation sued Frank F. Pulver in replevin to recover possession of certain type and typesetting machines which it had delivered to him originally under a conditional sales contract, and upon which it later took a chattel mortgage to secure the balance of the purchase price. It gave a replevin bond as required by state statute (see Comp. Gen. Laws Fla. 1927, §§ 5333, 5335), with the United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company as surety. Pulver, who did not give a forthcoming bond, obtained judgment in the court below for the sum of some $14,-000, the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Intertype Corp. v. PulverSupreme Court of Florida · 1931
- Intertype Corp. v. PulverCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1932
3Cited by9 opinions
- United States v. 93.970 Acres of LandCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1958
- Durham v. New Amsterdam Cas. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1953
- Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. OuartSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
- United States v. Idlewild Pharmacy, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1969
- Coronet Kitchens, Inc. v. Mortgage Mart, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1962
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.