Legal Opinion

Beam v. Morrow

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 19, 1985No. 8525SC445PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WELLS, Judge.

The threshold question is whether the order allowing plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary judgment is appealable. “A judgment is either interlocutory or the final determination of the rights of the parties.” N.C. Gen. Stat. § 1A-1, Rule 54(a) of the Rules of Civil Procedure. A final judgment disposes of the cause as to all the parties, leaving nothing to be determined between them in trial court. Industries, Inc. v. Insurance Co., 296 N.C. 486, 251 S.E. 2d 443 (1979). When more than one claim for relief is presented the court may enter a final judgment as to fewer than all the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Waters v. Qualified Personnel, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  2. Tridyn Industries, Inc. v. American Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  3. Equitable Leasing Corp. v. MyersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cagle v. TeachyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
  2. Jenco v. Signature Homes, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
  3. Wagner v. R, J & S AssociatesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API