Legal Opinion

Cagle v. Teachy

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 20, 1993No. 9219SC703PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHN, Judge.

Plaintiffs brought this action to recover for personal injuries to Mr. Cagle and loss of consortium to Mrs. Cagle resulting from an automobile collision. Pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 20-279.21, plaintiffs served their complaint upon Commercial Union Insurance Company [hereinafter “Commercial Union”], their own insurer, which thereafter appeared in this matter as an unnamed party under the statute.

In their complaint, plaintiffs asserted that Commercial Union had issued to them two insurance policies and made allegations concerning the coverage provided. Commercial Union filed an answer…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. ArtisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
  2. Waters v. Qualified Personnel, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  3. Bernick v. JurdenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  4. Tridyn Industries, Inc. v. American Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  5. Blackwelder v. State Department of Human ResourcesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. First Atlantic Management, Corp. v. Dunlea Realty, Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
  2. North Carolina Department of Transportation v. PageCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
  3. Bob Timberlake Collection, Inc. v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
  4. RPR & Associates, Inc. v. University of North Carolina-Chapel HillCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  5. CBP Resources, Inc. v. Mountaire Farms of North Carolina, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API