Legal Opinion
David Pantalion v. Sentry Insurance Company et al.
District Court, C.D. California
Decided July 8, 2026No. 2:24-cv-07417Unknown
1Opinion
O 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 United States District Court 9 Central District of California 10 11 DAVID PANTALION, Case № 2:24-cv-07417-ODW (Ex) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART 13 v. MOTION FOR SUMMARY 14 SENTRY INSURANCE COMPANY et JUDGMENT [42] al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 I. INTRODUCTION 18 Plaintiff David Pantalion demanded $1,000,000 in underinsured motorist 19 (“UIM”) insurance policy benefits for injuries he suffered in the course and scope of 20 his employment. Pantalion claims Defendant Middlesex Insurance Company acted in 21 bad faith by rejecting his policy limits demand and delaying…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Reloynne K. Villiarimo Joseph Harvest v. Aloha Island Air, Inc., Dba Island Air Rosie Nenezich Richard HeeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.