Legal Opinion

Shufeldt v. Gandy

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided February 17, 1892PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from the district court for Richardson county. Heard below before Bkoady, J. cited: Freeman, Judgments, sec. 547, 557; Caley v. Morgan, 114 Ind., 350, 355; Weigley v. Matron, 125 111., 64; 1 High, Injunction, secs. 2, 113, 127, 130; 2 Story, Eq. Jur., secs. 875, 1574; Carrington v. Holabird,\7 Conn., 530, 539; Ramseur v. Brownell, 12 S. W. Rep. [Ark.], 200; Mason v. Williams, 5 Am. Dec. [Va.], 505.

1Opinion of the CourtPost, J.

It was held on a former appeal in this case that the petition did not state facts which would entitle the plaintiffs *33to relief in equity against the judgments complained of. (See 25 Neb., 602.) An amended petition was subsequently filed and a second trial had, and defendant again appeals.

We deem it unnecessary to notice the first question argued, namely, the sufficiency of the amended petition, since in our judgment there is a failure of proof and defendant is entitled to judgment on that ground.

On the 11th day of October, 1887, B. E. Berry, a justice of the peace for Richardson county,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Miller v. MorseMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
  2. Shufeldt v. GandyNebraska Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ely Walker Dry Goods Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  2. Klabunde v. Byron Reed Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Pavlik v. BurnsNebraska Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Watters v. HarrisNebraska Supreme Court · 1947
  5. State Ex Rel. L.L.B. v. HillNebraska Supreme Court · 2004

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API