Rockingham Square Shopping Center, Inc. v. Town of Madison
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
PARKER, Judge.
Upon its motion for summary judgment on plaintiff’s cause of action, defendant town had the burden of showing that there was no triable issue of fact, and that it was entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Pitts v. Pizza, Inc., 296 N.C. 81, 249 S.E. 2d 375 (1978); Kessing v. Mortgage Corp., 278 N.C. 523, 180 S.E. 2d 823 (1971). Because plaintiff’s complaint on its face discloses that no cause of action exists, summary judgment for defendant was properly granted in the present case. McNair v. Boyette, 282 N.C. 230, 192 S.E. 2d 457 (1972).
The basis of the action here at issue…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Kessing v. National Mortgage CorporationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- McNair v. BoyetteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- Pitts v. Village Inn Pizza, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- Edwards v. Goldsboro.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
- Madry v. Town of Scotland NeckSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Eastway Wrecker Service, Inc. v. City of CharlotteCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
- Blevins v. Board of Douglas County Comm'rsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1992
- Marco Development Corp. v. City of Cedar FallsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1991
- Pritchard v. Elizabeth CityCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
- PCB PARTNERSHIP v. City of LargoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.