Legal Opinion

Beaudoin v. South Texas Blood & Tissue Center

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 1, 2004No. 20030148PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.

[¶ 1] Michael Beaudoin appealed from a judgment dismissing without prejudice his action against South Texas Blood & Tissue Center (“South Texas”). We conclude South Texas was properly served with process, and we reverse and remand for further proceedings.

[¶ 2] Beaudoin had his right patellar tendon surgically replaced on August 23, 2000, in Dickinson, North Dakota, with a tendon removed from a cadaver in Texas. At the request of a Connecticut corporation, South Texas shipped the tendon to Dickinson. Beaudoin sued South Texas, alleging the tendon was not sterile, and…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Fashion Page, Ltd. v. Zurich InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Becker v. BeckerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Johnson v. HauglandNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Sime v. Tvenge Associates Architects & Planners, P.C.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Tullis v. Federated Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1997

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Sanderson v. Walsh CountyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Mann v. ND Tax CommissionerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Olsrud v. BISMARCK MANDAN ORCHESTRAL ASS'NNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Thompson v. ThompsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  5. James Vault & Precast Co. v. B&B Hot Oil Service, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2018

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API