Beaudoin v. South Texas Blood & Tissue Center
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.
[¶ 1] Michael Beaudoin appealed from a judgment dismissing without prejudice his action against South Texas Blood & Tissue Center (“South Texas”). We conclude South Texas was properly served with process, and we reverse and remand for further proceedings.
[¶ 2] Beaudoin had his right patellar tendon surgically replaced on August 23, 2000, in Dickinson, North Dakota, with a tendon removed from a cadaver in Texas. At the request of a Connecticut corporation, South Texas shipped the tendon to Dickinson. Beaudoin sued South Texas, alleging the tendon was not sterile, and…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Fashion Page, Ltd. v. Zurich InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Becker v. BeckerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
- Johnson v. HauglandNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
- Sime v. Tvenge Associates Architects & Planners, P.C.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
- Tullis v. Federated Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Sanderson v. Walsh CountyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
- Mann v. ND Tax CommissionerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
- Olsrud v. BISMARCK MANDAN ORCHESTRAL ASS'NNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
- Thompson v. ThompsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
- James Vault & Precast Co. v. B&B Hot Oil Service, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.