Legal Opinion

Simos v. Clark

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 16, 1926No. 25,560PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilson, C. J.

Appeal from an order striking out portions of the complaint.

The complaint alleges: On October 12, 1920, defendant owned a building in Fairmont which he desired to rent as a restaurant. The building was occupied by Oheney Brothers. In order to induce plaintiffs to take a lease of the building defendant stated that Oheney Brothers were occupying it temporarily and had no right to hold it longer than December 1, 1920; that their lease had been forfeited and determined and that possession would be surrendered on or before December 1, 1920, and that he could and would give possession to plaintiffs…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lovering v. Webb Publishing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
  2. Baer v. Waseca Milling CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
  3. Wade v. Citizens State BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Matesic v. MarasSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
  2. Allum v. Federal Cartridge Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API