Legal Opinion

Lynn v. Richardson

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided May 9, 1911PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from Linn District Court. — Hon. Milo P. Smith, Judge. ’Action to recover damages for au alleged breach of a contract of sale. Defendant denied that there was any contract, and pleaded some other issues not necessary to be noted at this time. Trial to a jury, verdict and judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtDeemer, J.

The parties are each dentists, and, before the happening of the matters in controversy, defendant was engaged in the practice of his profession at Cedar Rapids, Iowa, and plaintiff was likewise engaged at the town of Dysart, in this state. In the early part of November of the year 1909, defendant concluded to dispose of his business, and in some manner learned that plaintiff was a prospective purchaser. Various letters and telegrams passed between the parties, and on November 9, 1909, plaintiff went to Cedar Rapids and looked over defendant’s office and business. Thereupon he, plaintiff, made…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Beckwith v. TalbotSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Spinney v. DowningCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Breckinridge v. CrockerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Edge Moor Bridge Works v. County of BristolMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1898
  5. Lee v. ButlerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1897

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. First National Bank v. Burton, Parsons & Co.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1984
  2. Bremhorst v. Phillips Coal Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1927
  3. Fremon v. W. A. Sheaffer Pen Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1954
  4. Massee v. GibbsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
  5. May v. SESSUMS & MASON PADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API