Legal Opinion

Conn v. Middlebury Union High School District 3

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided September 2, 1994No. 93-420PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.

Plaintiffs appeal from a superior court decision, which concluded that defendant Middlebury Union High School District #3 was authorized to borrow money for a period exceeding one year without following the procedure set forth in 24 V.S.A. §§ 1751-1785 to obtain bond approval. We hold that the school district had no authority to borrow money beyond one year without a bond vote and, therefore, reverse.

On May 18,1993, the district school board decided to call a special meeting of the district electorate to obtain authorization to borrow $180,000 for a period not to exceed five years, to…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Burlington Electric Department v. Vermont Department of TaxesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1990
  2. Bisson v. WardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1993
  3. Hill v. ConwaySupreme Court of Vermont · 1983
  4. Robes v. Town of HartfordSupreme Court of Vermont · 1993
  5. E. B. & A. C. Whiting Co. v. City of BurlingtonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1934

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Secretary, Vermont Agency of Natural Resources v. Handy Family EnterprisesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1995
  2. Shea v. MetcalfSupreme Court of Vermont · 1998
  3. Sagar v. Warren SelectboardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1999
  4. Knollwood Building Condominiums v. Town of RutlandSupreme Court of Vermont · 1997
  5. Wood v. EddySupreme Court of Vermont · 2003

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API