State ex rel. Albert Dickinson Co. v. District Court
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Upon the relation of Albert Dickinson Company. and another the supreme, court granted its writ of- certiorari to review the proceedings in the district Court for Hennepin County, Dickinson, J., under the Workmen’s Compensation Act brought by Mary Cora Raekman, as widow of Robert G. Raekman, employee, against The Albert Djckinson Company, employer, and Fidelity & Casualty Company, insurer.
1Opinion of the CourtHallam, J.
On April 3, 1916, Robert G. Raekman was employed by the Albert Dickinson Company loading and unloading bags into and from box cars. He quit at 9:03 p. m. He lived some distance away. It took 20 minutes or longer to go on a street car from his place of work to his home. He arrived home at about 9:30 p. m. When he arrived home he had a scratch on one hand. It was about half an inch long and not very deep but the skin was “torn quite badly” and it had been “bleeding quite badly.” He had wrapped it in a piece of handkerchief. This was bloody. The blood was hard. Witnesses say it looked as though…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Herrick v. MorrillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
- Stitt v. Rat Portage Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
- Bitzer v. BoboSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
- Blaess v. DolphMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
- Gourd v. County of MorrisonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Anderson v. Coca Cola Bottling Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
- Cudahy Packing Co. v. BrownUtah Supreme Court · 1922
- Keane v. Arrowhead Steel Products Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
- Lieberman v. FoxSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
- Boyd v. BruceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.