Legal Opinion

State v. Zephier

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 29, 2012No. 26030PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILBUR, Justice.

[¶ 1.] Jeremy Zephier appeals his aggravated assault conviction arguing that the trial court abused its discretion in denying his (1) proposed jury instruction and (2) motion for a new trial. We affirm.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

[¶2.] Zephier was at Donita Wika’s Vermillion apartment drinking beer with friends on a Friday evening. That same evening, Julia Marshall, Zephier’s former girlfriend, was with her new boyfriend, Carlos Diaz. Marshall and Diaz visited several bars in downtown Vermillion where both consumed alcohol. When the bars closed, both Marshall and Diaz…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bertelsen v. Allstate Insurance Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Fix v. First State Bank of RoscoeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Hofer v. ClassSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Denoyer v. WeberSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  5. State v. ShepardSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. HannemannSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  2. State v. TimmonsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2022
  3. State v. SheltonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021
  4. State v. WhistlerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  5. State v. White FaceSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API