Legal Opinion
United States v. Arthur A. Coia, Arthur E. Coia, Albert J. Le Pore, and Joseph J. Vacarro, Jr.
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided November 17, 1983No. 82-5369PublishedCited by 92 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TJOFLAT, Circuit Judge:
The United States appeals the dismissal on statute of limitations grounds of an indictment alleging that Arthur A. Coia, Arthur E. Coia, Albert J. Le Pore, and Joseph J. Vacarro, Jr., violated the conspiracy portion of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organization Act (RICO), 18 U.S.C. § 1962(d) (1976).1 We reverse.
I
On September 23, 1981, a federal grand jury in the Southern District of Florida charged the four appellees and one other defendant in a one-count indictment, alleging that they had conspired to engage in labor racketeering, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
- Toussie v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Nash v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- United States v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Fiswick v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by92 opinions
- United States v. Angelo Pepe and Thomas Miglionico, United States of America v. Albert Joseph Facchiano, Francis Santo, Paul SantoCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
- United States v. PersicoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- United States v. McNairCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010
- United States v. StarrettCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1995
- Keystone Insurance Company v. Houghton, Joseph, Houghton, Donna Livoy, Cassidy, John, Cassidy, Kathleen, Livoy, FrankCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
87 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.