Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Harold Esquilin-Montanez [2]

United States District Court

Decided March 27, 2018No. CRIMINAL NO. 16–796 (PG)Published

1Opinion of the Court

GUSTAVO A. GELPÍ* , UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Pending before the court are the defendants Harold Esquilin-Montanez and James Stewart-Carrasquillo's motions for judgment of acquittal under Rule 29 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure (Dockets No. 243, 245) and the government's response thereto (Docket No. 247). After carefully considering the parties' arguments, the court DENIES the defendants' motions for the reasons explained below.

I. BACKGROUND

On August 7, 2017, a jury found co-defendants Harold Esquilin-Montanez ("Esquilin") and James Stewart-Carrasquillo ("Stewart") guilty of the…

2Cases cited57 opinions

  1. United States v. Lugo GuerreroCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008
  2. United States v. Johnny Rafael Batista-PolancoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
  3. United States v. Marco A. EcheverriCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
  4. United States v. Calvin Caver (05-3295) Tamir Abdullah (05-3297) Fred Cloud (05-3344)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
  5. United States v. Ayala-VazquezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2014

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API