Rodriguez v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
By this criminal appeal, the defendants raise several questions relating to: (1) The failure of the trial judge to grant a severance upon a pre-trial motion; (2) The failure to grant a mistrial because of alleged prejudicial comments by the State’s witness; and (3) Alleged irregularity in the admission of certain evidence which had been previously identified. We affirm.
It is within the discretion of a trial judge to grant a severance and it is incumbent upon an appellant, when urging error on this ground, to demonstrate an abuse of this discretion. Jackman v. State, Fla.App.1962, 140 So.2d…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Jackman v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1962
- Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1953
- Tribue v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1958
- Simpson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1968
- Gurr v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1942
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Stripling v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
- Ballard v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975
- State v. TalaveraSupreme Court of Florida · 1971
- Hanks v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974
- Milagros-Martinez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999