Legal Opinion

Timberlake Construction Co., Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. U.S. Fidelity and Guaranty Co., Defendant-Appellant/cross-Appellee

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided November 22, 1995No. 94-6080, 94-6149PublishedCited by 108 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OWEN, Senior District Judge.

Defendant-appellant U.S. Fidelity and Guaranty Company (“Fidelity”) appeals from an adverse jury verdict in an action commenced by its insured, plaintiff-appellee Tim-berlake Construction Company.

Timberlake contracted with Wal-Mart Stores to build a Wal-Mart supercenter in Claremore, Oklahoma. It purchased a $4,600,000 builders’ risk insurance policy from Fidelity to cover risks associated with construction of the building. The policy covered the period from July 12,1991 to August 15, 1992. It provided that coverage would terminate when the project was “accepted by…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Palmer v. HoffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Anderson v. Continental InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Christian v. American Home Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1978
  4. Timmons v. Royal Globe Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
  5. Jaclyn G. Oulds, an Individual v. Principal Mutual Life Insurance Co., an Iowa Corporation and Principal Financial Group, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by108 opinions

  1. Hertz v. Luzenac America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
  2. Betty Jordan v. Kelly BinnsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
  3. Sims v. Great American Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
  4. Tracey Lust v. Sealy, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
  5. Haberman v. Hartford Insurance GroupCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006

103 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API