People ex rel. Johnson v. Follette
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtClare J. Hoyt, J.
The above 19 relators, all inmates of Green Haven Prison, and returned there by reason of parole *475violations, seek their release in these habeas corpus proceedings because they were not afforded counsel at the parole revocation hearings before the Parole Board. Since this common question is raised in all these proceedings, this single opinion will determine all of these proceedings.
Petitioners rely on a Fourth Department decision, People ex rel. Combs v. La Vallee (29 A D 2d 128, app. dsmd. 22 N Y 2d 857) which granted relief in a habeas corpus proceeding by directing the Board of Parole to…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Mempa v. RhaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Escoe v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Hyser v. ReedCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1963
- People, Ex Rel. McDonald v. . KeelerNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
- Herbert E. Rose v. E. B. Haskins, SuperintendentCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1968
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Knight v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1969
- State v. Nelson (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
- State v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1969
- People ex rel. Smith v. DeeganAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1969
- State v. Nelson (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.