Legal Opinion

People ex rel. Smith v. Deegan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 7, 1969PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In a habeas corpus proceeding, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered October 11, 1968, which dismissed the writ *941Judgment affirmed, without costs. In our opinion, section 218 of the Correction Law is not unconstitutional insofar as it denies a parolee the right of counsel at a hearing for revocation of his parole. The Federal courts have consistently held that parole is a matter of grace and that such a hearing does not involve constitutional due process, neither the assistance of counsel nor even a hearing being constitutionally mandated (see, e.g.,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Mempa v. RhaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Hannah v. LarcheSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. Stuart v. . PalmerNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  4. In Re GrobanSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  5. Herbert E. Rose v. E. B. Haskins, SuperintendentCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1968

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Warren v. Parole BoardMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970
  2. People ex rel. Ayers v. Lombard, New York County Courts1976
  3. Thomas Palermo and Sheldon Saltzman v. Warden, Green Haven State Prison, and Russell OswaldCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
  4. Thomas Palermo and Sheldon Saltzman v. Warden, Green Haven State Prison, and Russell OswaldCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
  5. United States ex rel. Egbert v. WardenDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1970

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API