Legal Opinion
Joyner v. Holland
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided August 2, 1965No. 3717PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CAYTON, Judge:
Here for review is a decision of the trial court holding the owner of an automobile liable for the negligent operation thereof by his co-owner.
Following are the essential facts presented below. Appellant Joyner and a man named Foreman were owners of an automobile. Foreman was operating the automobile, Joyner not being with him at the time, and was involved in a collision with Holland. Holland and his insurer sued the two owners, Joyner and Foreman. Foreman defaulted and judgment was entered against him. Joyner presented no evidence by way of defense but moved for judgment on the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Krum v. MalloyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Curry v. StevensonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1928
- Hiscox v. JacksonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942
- Lancaster v. CanuelDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1963
- Moore v. NoorthoekMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Green v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
- Curtis v. CuffDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
- Alsbrooks v. Washington Deliveries, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1971
- Hertz Corp. v. DixonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
- Athridge v. IglesiasDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.