Legal Opinion

Hurst v. Farmer

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided March 18, 1985No. 12634-2-IPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.

Sammy Hurst brought this action against Jess Farmer, Ron Altier, Cathleen Johnson, Nadean Priestly and Kendra Brown, alleging (1) that they conspired to prevent Hurst's continued employment with Earle M. Jorgensen Company by creating false documents regarding his misconduct; (2) that Farmer and Altier deprived him of due process of law by failing to ascertain that his termination of employment was for a valid reason; and (3) that Altier's conduct was "outrageous, slanderous, willful, knowing, malicious and fraudulent and intentionally harmful" to Hurst. The trial court granted defendants'…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Grimsby v. SamsonWashington Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Thomas v. PetrulisAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984
  3. Engelmohr v. BacheWashington Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Medina v. Spotnail, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1984
  5. Lehmann v. Board of Trustees of Whitman CollegeWashington Supreme Court · 1978

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Story v. Shelter Bay CompanyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1988
  2. Richmond v. ThompsonWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Lawson v. Boeing CompanyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1990
  4. McCormick v. Lake Washington School DistrictCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1999
  5. Hill v. J.C. Penney, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1993

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API